For anyone who can handle the Truth :
( mpg123 -@ http://republicbroadcasting.org/32k.pls )
into ground shaking radio that will snap your neck in odd directions :
( mplayer "mms://196.44.225.194/channel islam"
on Tuesdays and Fridays at 22 CET/4PM EST/1PM Pacific. )
The Home of Cutting Edge Talk Radio :
( mpg123 -@ http://www.oraclebroadcasting.com/48k.pls )
Transcript of the EU Council on the Software Patent Directive
On Mar 7, 2005, The Council Presidency declared the software agreement of 18 May 2004 to have been adopted, in violation of the procedural rules and in spite of the evident lack of a qualified majority of member states and the requests of several states to reopen negotiations.
Software Patent Directive Passed as A-Item .
This raised many eyebrows, and the most of them were the EU members
of Parliament themselves. No-one could really 'grok' what really happened
so many provided a transcript of the Mar 7, 2005 Council Presidency session.
Transcript of EU Commission Meeting on Software Patent Directive .
As a backup service of this highly controversial piece of oral politics
i present my own transcript as interpreted from the audio wav file.
I used the following wav file :
Transcript of the Council Meeting at March 7
2005. :
"Today we shall pass this out to the EU parliament with due
to
negotiation for final adoption of this really important
directive. We shall
translate it today or tomorrow so that
parliament can start working on it
immediately so that
there is no delay between our decision be made here in
the
beginning of work in the parliament.
May i conclude that
with all delegations such as been
working against, Portugal Spain Italy who
are stating, can
i take it that all delegations can accept the joint
conversation and the accompanying in Spanish memorandum as
set out in the
documents before us.
Can the council also accept including in the
minutes the
statement made by the commission as wel as statements made
by the Hungarian, Lithuation, Dutch Polish and Danish
delegations i
think.. and they will be set out in the
documents before you."
/* The delegate of Cyprus raises his voice, and gets
'switched off'
*/
"And we also have a statement on behalf of Cyprus.
Have I ..
I would just like to add two words, a few
words on this
point, as part of the formalities adopting it. I say this
without wishing to re-open the actual debate today. We are
all well aware
of the situation faced with an adapt which
we've been expecting on this
matter on various sides. We
are adopting this conversation today for
institutional
reasons. And so as not to create a precedent which might
have a consequence of creating further delays in very
difficult
legislative presidency which is at their
decision. The commission has taken
up her own
responsibilities and eh i thank the commission for that. I
know that a number of members including those i mentioned,
Poland ,
Portugal, would have preferred the point we're
dealing with here to be the
subject of a B-point
discussion at our Council. I was not able to accept
that.
You may tell me this is a vast operate presidency but
there are proceedings which we have to respect. And it
would have complete
undermined the whole logic of the
exercise as provided for under the
procedures and which we
have to conduct by adopting this bill .. excuse me
, by
adopting this, what is its name, point. Any ehh .. so
your
decision would open a door too to a second reading by
the EU parliament.
And as i said when i appeared before a commission for
Parliament
in January, it would be appropriate for the
institution to find a area of
understanding. A compromise
which recognizes the individious rights
expressed both by
the business world and users. It is not up to today to
sketch at all various possibilities for compromise which
could be found
on the substance in the months to come. As
it is quite clear that such
clarifications will have to be
made, due respect to what remains to be seen
as being
legal uncertainty in the current Council position.
I
had indicated that i did not want a substantive
discussion on this, but i
did want to underline these few
points which demonstrate that the
presidency and the
council have taken notes on concerns expressed by a
number
of countries who have stated a wish to see a different
compromise.
Here your are, i would not like to have any
substantive
discussion at this point. This A-point. This far as a
procedures concern thing. Ben has asked me this before.
Yes thank your
Chairman.
Well you know, ehh Denmark's wish, it is to see this
boselin inventioned, complete premarented and inventioned,
we would like
to see this treated at this Council meeting
as a B-point. I have a NO to
your comments to the effect
that you cannot accept that, in to as far as
this is only
the formal culmination of political agreement, found in
May last year. So the matter goes to the EU Parliament. I
nonetheless
think the most appropriate thing would be to
take the matter to a B-point,
But if this is not possible,
I am not going to stand in the way of a formal
adoption of
the point. Therefor regretfully submit a written statement
to be included the minutes. The points in that statement
will be pursued
by us when this matter comes back to the
council after the EU parliament
has concluded its 2nd
reading. Thank you chairman."
/* A
French member wants to make some comments, in
french of course. */
/* and guess what? gets switched off. */
"Thank you but i
will take notes of your statement and i
thank you for your comments. ....
So i think i can
note? .... "
/* The man now speaks to
himself : */
"(He doesn't want me to speak? SWITCH ME
OFF!)
Ehhm ... I'd like now all to invite the council to adopt
the other points of the list of A-points."
"Vladimir Bukovksy, the 63-year old former Soviet dissident, fears
that the European Union is on its way to becoming another Soviet
Union. In a speech he delivered in Brussels last week Mr Bukovsky
called the EU a monster that must be destroyed, the sooner the
better, before it develops into a fullfledged totalitarian state."
[press bulletin] Queen abdicates her constitutional responsibility
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 07:32:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Robert M. Stockmann" stock@stokkie.net
To: stewwebb@sierranv.net, stefangrossmann@t-online.de,
too@slingshot.co.nz, wmreditor@waynemadsenreport.com,
palast@gregpalast.com, tom@tomflocco.com, skolnick@ameritech.net,
henry@savethemales.ca, leurenmoret@yahoo.com,
prophecy@texemarrs.com, smith@iamthewitness.com,
eric@iamthewitness.com, captainmay@prodigy.net,
tarpley@tarpley.net, takingaim@pacbell.net, webmaster@rense.com,
articles@davidicke.com, chamish@netvision.net.il,
michaelcollinspiper1960@yahoo.com, crescentandcross@gmail.com,
tips@infowars.com, cloak.dagger@gmail.com, lennybloom@gmail.com,
eric@vaticanassassins.org, email@spirituallysmart.com,
deadlinelive@yahoo.com, vyzygoth@hotmail.com,
alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com, Tillawi@currentissues.tv,
prothink@yahoo.com
cc: kevin.bonici@europarl.europa.eu, jens-peter.bonde@europarl.europa.eu,
diana.wallis@europarl.europa.eu, nigel.farage@europarl.europa.eu,
Arend Lammertink lamare@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [press bulletin] Queen abdicates her constitutional responsibility
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0805280704470.23742-100000@hubble.stokkie.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
Hi,
Below is a translation from a email sent to Arend Lammertink, from
vrijschrift.org, after he sent a open letter to Queen Beatrix of the
Netherlands warning about her constitutional responsibility :
On Sat, 24 May 2008, Arend Lammertink wrote:
> Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 00:50:05 +0200
> From: Arend Lammertink <lamare@gmail.com>
> To: nieuws@tuks.nl, vips@tuks.nl, politiek@tuks.nl
> Subject: [press bulletin] Queen abdicates her constitutional responsibility
>
> ==========================================================================
> 24/05/08: Queen abdicates her constitutional responsibility
> ==========================================================================
>
> The Hague - In response to a letter concerning the failure to sign
> and ratify the new European Constitution by the Queen, because she
> would breach oath, the Queens Cabinet writes that she has put aside
> this letter for treatment at the Prime Minister due to Ministerial
> responsibility. With this the Queen abdicates her responsibility to
> preserve and protect the sovereignty of our country.
>
> Normally abdicating such matters to Ministerial responsibility is
> a perfect logical procedure, but not in this case.
>
> In our statutional constitution as designed by Thorbecke the Queen has
> also her own responsibility by which she is above the Government.
> It concerns here tasks which are specifically mentioned inside
> the Queens constitutional oath. This oath is not sworn in to, or,
> on behalf of the Government, but directly to the Dutch people.
>
> According the writer of the previous letter, Ir. A.H. Lammertink,
> The Queen can not abdicate this responsibility to a Ministerial
> responsibility. Because of this he wrote a second letter where
> amongst others is written :
>
> "Since the now to ratify new European constitutional treaty directly
> intervenes with what you have sworn to protect, I once again point
> explicitly to your personal responsibility for these constitutional
> allocated tasks. These cannot be abdicated to Ministerial
> responsibility, simply because these tasks are meant to regulate
> the Ministers and Parliament ultimo in name of the people and if
> necessary keep these in bridle. And of course since Ministers can
> not carry responsibility for control of their own conduct of
> affairs, it cannot be different then that you, Her Majesty the
> Queen, carry this responsibility personally and thereby bear
> justification to God and the Dutch people directly."
>
Her Majesty the Queen of The Netherlands can of course never sign the
current draft for the new European Constitution, as this document was
created during very suspicious and doubtful circumstances, by which
amongst others the European Parliament has been completely bypassed and
now proves to be, afterwards, for 100% designed and drafted by the
European Commission and Council only.
It seems that a important part of the Lisbon treaty was the signing of
the old draft of the European Constitution, as it was rejected by
referendum by both France and The Netherlands. Strangely enough, it now
proves afterwards to be the case that immediately after Lisbon, the
most important EU member states have dropped the referendum option,
which amongst others include Germany, England, The Netherlands and
France. The first feat of arms of Sarkozy, Gordon Brown and Angela
Merkel was in fact to drop the referendum option, without allowing a
National Parliamental discussion about this to take place.
The requirement that the European Constitution has to be ratified by
unanimous vote has because of this been expired and dropped like a hot
potato. On December 12th 2007, the European Parliament has reacted on
this in a furious manner. Within the regular press of the EU member
countries nothing about this has of course been published.
On Youtube the following clips can be watched :
European Parliament: Members' Protest - 12.12.2007http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JJlI9swbsA
Support the Action "I demand a referendum for the next European
Treaty" at http://x09.eu/
Yes my Friends, this is bloody serious. This is Nazi Germany in 1933,
where Hitler pulled everything out of the cupboard to takeover power in
Germany. Democracy didn't exist back then. Keep Beatrix and her Royal
Court in close watch, as it may be the case that the Orange Family will
soon disappear across our nations border.
In 1933 the Germans knew what they could expect to happen. Today I have
seen very scarce information mesmerizing about who the new feudal power
broker of Europe will be. It predicts little good.
> ==========================================================================
> Further Information
> ==========================================================================
>
> Open letter to H.M. The Queen of the Netherlands:
> http://www.tuks.nl/docs/Open_Brief_HM_Koningin_2.pdf
>
> Open letter to H.M. The Queen of the Netherlands:
> http://www.tuks.nl/docs/Open_Brief_HM_Koningin.pdf
>
> Background article "Europa: No democracy as such"
> http://www.tuks.nl/docs/Geen_Democratie_als_zodanig.pdf
>
> ==========================================================================
> Contact
> ==========================================================================
>
> Ir. Arend Lammertink:
> email: lamare at tuks.nl
> lamare at gmail.com
> gsm: +316 5425 6426
>
> ==========================================================================
Kind Regards,
Robert
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org stock@stokkie.net
'A constitution is indeed a corset for those who seek power. (...) But
constitutional principles are not corsets for the political discourse of a free
society; they are the necessary condition for having any discourse at all
about how purposes are to be fulfilled in that society.'
(N.Johnson. In Search of the Constitution. pp. 147-48.)
It certainly looks like Ben Stein got expelled from the Internet. Yoko
Ono is playing the bad Bitch because Stein used a small clipping from
Imagine. This is absurd.
Ben Stein should simply openup shop and start selling boxed DVD
versions of Expelled. These days People dont visit city movie theathers
in large crowds to watch docus like Expelled. They might get beaten up
by a couple of Darwin followers, telling you "only the strong will
survive."
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 04:20:46 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Robert M. Stockmann"
To: lessig@pobox.com
Subject: Re: The Future of Ideas
Message-ID:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
Dear Professor Lessig,
It's been a long time since i visited your website, lessig.org.
I would like to make a remark about your book from 2001 "The Future of
Ideas". We are now seven years later, and the veil of what is going on
behind the curtain, at the back of the theater, has largely been lifted.
You start "The Future of Ideas, The fate of the Commons in a Connected
World" [3] with the following :
"Okay, so picture just what this means: As Guggenheim describes it,
"[B]efore you shoot, you have this set of people on the payroll who
are submitting everything you're using to the lawyers. The lawyers
check the list and then say what can be used and what cannot. If
you cannot find the original of a piece of artwork . . . you cannot
use it." Even if you can find it, often permission will be denied.
The lawyers thus decide what's allowed in the film. They decide what
can be in the story.
The lawyers insist upon this control because the legal system has
taught them how costly less control can be. The film Twelve Monkeys
was stopped by a court twenty-eight days after its release because
an artist claimed a chair in the movie resembled a sketch of a
piece of furniture that he had designed. The movie Batman Forever
was threatened because the Batmobile drove through an allegedly
copyrighted courtyard and the original architect demanded money
before the film could be released. In 1998, a judge stopped the
release of The Devils Advocate for two days because a sculptor
claimed his art was used in the background. These events teach the
lawyers that they must control the filmmakers. They convince
studios that creative control is ultimately a legal matter.
This control creates burdens, and not just expense. ..."
The rest of Guggenheim's quote in the last subparagraph is of course
pure bullshit. Here's what I make of the above method of creating Art,
Motion Pictures and, most important, Documentaries which present
delicate subjects in order to shape the Commoners opinion about them.
The method Guggenheim is describing is what i would call the "Total
Controlled Demolition" approach, which allows him to clear all lines of
control to the cream of the crop of the artistic community. As a result
the quality of the produced raw material is automaticly at a high
level. But Herr Guggenheim is still in full command and control of
which edited version is released into the Commoners home cinema or
theater. Now why would Guggenheim need such a absurd level of control?
It might very well have been the case, that Twelve Monkies touched upon
a hidden truth, which in previous decades has been buried with many
pains-taken efforts by Secret Service Agencies of the various countries
who were active in creating and regulating the outcome of World war I
and II ...
Now if Guggenheim detects that "Twelve Monkies" contains such a hidden
truth, he then can use one of the many Copyright hookups inside the
footage of "Twelve Monkies" to simply abort and amputate the entire
movie production, by using a "Total Controlled Demolition" Copyright
hookup as bullshit reason.
I myself have arrived at a even further reaching conclusion which I
recently emailed to a small list [1]:
"As today ground-breaking and essential news reporting more and more
is maimed and hidden on purpose through ludicrous Copyrights
Issues, I hereby bypass the Copyrights Issue on below mentioned
audio file as published on the rense.com archives. If rense.com
wants to prosecute this, I welcome this, as I will deflect all
attention from the press to Brig. General Ben Partin's contribution.
"Brig Gen. Ben Partin - The Takeover Of America"
May 29, 2008
..."
In short : Lying has become a art. The best ones get elected President.
The professional ones however never tell lies, they simply sell "Total
Controlled Demolition" Copyright as bullshit reasons to hide the truth.
The seasoned professionals are to be found in Copyright Law offices and
have made it their own branch of religion by selling Copyright Law as
truth itself.
Once in a lifetime they, however, do need to open up their dirty back
alley kitchen doors, as we all experienced at 9/11 2001.
Some have claimed that 9/11 can be explained by using money as sole
motive [2]. But money was not the sole motive why 9/11 happened. 9/11
happened because the Internet made its act of appearance as that new
disturbing technology, which, most important, rendered void the old
techniques of hiding truth. Even Microsoft's Bill Gates had initially
failed to foresee the impact of the Internet. 9/11 was a renewed New
Pearl Harbor and Reichtags fire to pull the strings of power tighter
together.
Best Regards,
Robert
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org stock@stokkie.net
[3] The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World
by Lawrence Lessig
Paperback: 384 pages
Publisher: Vintage (October 22, 2002)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0375726446
ISBN-13: 978-0375726446
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0375726446
On October 8, 2008 Ono and EMI decided to drop the lawsuit on the "Imagine" sound clip inside the Documentary "Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed". "The DVD release of Expelled will not include the song [Imagine]." That's Hypocrisy written in "Gold" painted letters at the top of the Movie Director's office door.
For anyone who can handle the Truth :
( mpg123 -@ http://republicbroadcasting.org/32k.pls )
into ground shaking radio that will snap your neck in odd directions :
( mplayer "mms://196.44.225.194/channel islam"
on Tuesdays and Fridays at 22 CET/4PM EST/1PM Pacific. )
The Home of Cutting Edge Talk Radio :
( mpg123 -@ http://www.oraclebroadcasting.com/48k.pls )
Contents : The Infowar Techniques of the Rendon Group: a possible theory The Trial of 'Scooter' Libby CIA Whites Out National Intelligence Estimate Whats up with Condoleeza's eyes? Irving Lewis Leibowitz Ray McGovern's open letter Ambassador Richard W. Carlson Downloads
As all the info coming to us is mostly in online
articles and videos, The White House outsourced propaganda to company's
like The Rendon Group. As no-one is able to visit the place of
terrorist attacks to make a independent report, faking news is a easy
task. If a fascist group propagates false propaganda using forged
documents like the yellow cake ones, the emerging picture becomes a
evil nightmare. James Bamford wrote a couple of articles about the
Rendon Group. John Rendon and the U.S. propoganda . I think this goes
even further, like the ultimate "1984" scenario, The Infowar Techniques
of the Rendon Group: a possible theory. Recently the Trial of Scooter
Libby was brought for the Grand Jury for a final verdict. A overview is
given on how Valerie Plame's Non Official Cover (NOC) for the CIA was
leaked to the press.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 70047 Nov 29 22:28 rendon/index.html
64f1b23615902e64ada7dcc9ba0af694 rendon/index.html
Contents : The Illuminati and the Counsel on Foreign Relations Harry Hopkins Silent Book/DVD Censorship in the free western world Re: The 'Ugly Secret' Of World War Two Barack Zeke Midas Obama Downloads
Myron C. Fagan, a Hollywood Writer Director, was given access in 1945
to evidence from "Illuminati" circles comprising a set of micro-films
and recordings of the SECRET meetings at Yalta attended only by
Franklin Roosevelt, Alger Hiss, Harry Hopkins, Stalin, Molotov, and
Vishinsky when they hatched the plot to deliver the Balkans, Eastern
Europe and Berlin to Stalin. A month after the Six-Day war and the
attack on the USS Liberty, Fagan stepped forward in July 1967 and
presented his knowledge in a audio recording, today available in mp3
format.
-rw-r--r-- 2 crashrec klant 76601 Nov 7 03:57 fagan/index.html
3e1d3f3a76876b30f3e0acffa7e72877 fagan/index.html
Contents : "HITLER was a BRITISH AGENT" Top Kiwis Smeared House of Stuart, Sinclair and Wettin The Trojan Prime Ministers Downloads
Greg Hallett, a researcher and writer from the
intelligence community wrote a book titled "Hitler was a BRITISH
AGENT". a interesting and intriguing book which presents a theory which
fits like a glove inside the official stories and official biographies
published since the 1970's on the subject. Normally a person never
would even think of this possibility, but Greg Hallett's contacts from
the community have issued numerous hints and warnings. The disturbing
trends in global geo-politics we all have seen happening since 2001,
left Hallett not much room as to publish this book.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 64285 Nov 6 01:45 hallett/index.html
c65cc0fff93611778259e21c919ea59e hallett/index.html
Contents : Transcript of the EU Council on the Software Patent Directive Queen abdicates her constitutional responsibility "Total Controlled Demolition" Copyright Downloads
On Mar 7, 2005 the EU Commission tried to pass the controversial EU
Software Patent Directive, neglecting Democratic rule inside EU
Parliament. On Feb 27, 2006 former Soviet Dissident Vladimir Bukovksy
warns for EU Dictatorship. On Dec 12, 2007 The EU Commission and
Council denied the referendum as part of the Democratic process to
create the European Constitution. It just seems that PART THREE
of the book "Waters flowing Eastward, The War against the Kingship of
Christ" by L.Fry titled "THE SOVIETIZATION OF GREAT BRITIAN AND THE UNITED
STATES" is indeed in full progress.
-rw-r--r-- 4 crashrec klant 29089 Oct 17 07:56 council-transcript/index.html
844fbe5fd3d340421f5f759435d82ff5 council-transcript/index.html
Contents : "Dark Matter, a result of the heliocentric doctrine" Art Bell - The Philidelphia Experiment - Al Bielek The Temple of Man Stellar Death Shrouds : The all-seeing evil eye? Downloads
"The Earth is not moving" is a astounding scholarly work
debunking the BIGGEST DECEPTION laid upon the grand public by the
Science Establishment ever. What Deception? The Heliocentric system
turns out to be a fabricated model of our planetary system, which
started around the year 1600, whilest the King James Bible was getting
translated. Marshall Hall starts of by mentioning that all NASA
calculations which should deliver the highest accuracy are based on a
non-moving earth!!
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 49607 Sep 10 14:53 fixedearth/index.html
2ec3af1751ed431a2581d716933b57b7 fixedearth/index.html
In March 2001 Susan Lindauer carried a message from
the Iraqi government to her cousin, the White House Chief of Staff,
requesting the return of weapons inspectors. But Bush nevertheless
attacked and invaded Iraq using WMD as a pretext, murdered as many as
500,000 people, and spread radioactive poison over the entire country,
which will murder millions more.
Susan Lindauer was for over period of almost a year in prison on false
claims of insanity, sentenced on Feb 15, 2006 by then U.S. District
Judge Michael Mukasey. On Sept. 8, 2006 the forced mental
hospitalization was however dropped by Mukasey, and she was
subsequently released. A most weird case as the hearings carousel is
continuing to this very day.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 15226 Aug 3 01:05 lindauer/index.html
e250fdc0a6d9f9ff7eb06d6a6ccd59d9 lindauer/index.html
Contents : To Eliminate The Opiate, Vol.1 Vol.2 The Hebrew Bible : from Aleppo Codex to "Rothschild Mahzor" Post WWII Bibles seriously flawed Downloads
Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman wrote a two volume book
which presents a overwhelming amount of evidence, names, dates and
events throughout the last century's which describe the abolishment of
Religion, in particular the Jewish, in order to spiritually dumb down
the grand public, in effect eliminating The Opiate of the people, their
religion as stated inside the Illuminati masterplan.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 52587 Jul 12 02:45 antelman/index.html
96eb54233869d2228dff64c42e2776ef antelman/index.html
Contents : Kelly had 'no right' to anonymity The secret Downing Street memo Memo: Bush manipulated Iraq intel Bush asked to explain UK war memo Indignation Grows in U.S. Over British Prewar Documents Downloads
David Kelly was a renowned Weapons Inspector for the U.N. and U.K.
Military. A 2002 dossier titled "IRAQ'S WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION"
triggered Kelly for a renewed WMD inspection inside Iraq and became
convinced that the only purpose of the IRAQ WMD dossier had been to get
a war going in Iraq. After testifying before the UK Congress, Kelly
went missing and was found dead on July 18, 2003. The Lord Hutton
inquiry concluded that Kelly had committed 'suicide'. Then on May 1,
2005 a verbatim copy of a secret "Downing Street memo" from July 23,
2002 was published stating that "intelligence and facts were being
fixed around the policy" to get a war going in Iraq. The
authenticity of this document, to this very day, has not been
disputed.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 42225 Jun 21 01:38 kelly/index.html
57a8d3d57cf77a94845104e20e89b143 kelly/index.html
Contents : "Satanic Voices, Ancient & Modern" "The Islam needs a French Revolution" Chirac's apprentice Downloads
David Musa Pidcock, a leading figure from the Islamic Party of Britain,
found himself seriously offended with many other people with Islamic
believes, when in 1988 Salman Rushdie published his book "Satanic Verses".
The media hype on tv was almost ludricous with how Satanic
Verses was promoted into highest circles of the 'Literature establishment'.
Pidcock however lowered his blood pressure and wrote a respons titled
"Satanic Voices, Ancient & Modern", which indeed, as he describes,
is a game set and match expose on the subject.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 48381 Jan 1 2008 pidcock/index.html
a34e60a00e0be6b2d3d60188d77a3ab5 pidcock/index.html
Norman Dodd, Paul Findley and Alan Hart present
their findings of facts which have directed America towards a highly
controversial direction, where as the late Norman Dodd stated : "Since
World War one, the men who lead this country, have institutionalized
conflicting interests to such an extend that they can never be
resolved. The Tax-Exempt foundations like the Cargenie Endowment, The
Ford and Rockerfeller foundation have been instrumental in this"
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 10354 Dec 23 2007 testimonials/index.html
3081d740433632c5ce1130dfec7cddbd testimonials/index.html
The Vatican Church has supported the Nazi's in the
1930's 40's and 50's. This connection turns out to be a very old one,
as middle eave Popes were emanating the agenda and mindset for the
crusades. This Nazi connection actually turns out to be a Teutonic
connection.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 13115 Nov 16 2007 teutonic/index.html
c11632ecd50a482781705e9d5854acce teutonic/index.html
A catholic Jesuit priest published a number of
articles in the 1950s illustrating numerous efforts by governmental
sponsored groups to systematic abolish the Catholic Religion and
religious faith in general.
-rw-rw-r-- 3 crashrec klant 5613 Nov 15 2007 fatherfeeney/index.html
f4b99d1cb482aa70baa7af1ce6842563 fatherfeeney/index.html
Barry Chamish, a political writer from Israel has
connected some dots regarding "the protocols of the learned elders of
Zion" which seem not to be the playbook of the Jewish people, but turn
out to be a masterplan designed by the Illuminati to take over the
world. A masterplan which denounces all wellbeing and prospering of
normal people.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 27127 Nov 12 2007 chamish/index.html
805592e5aa7fe648ad5b0479d36a3b09 chamish/index.html
a analysis about the French Revolution, still to be
completed and translated.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 28269 Nov 1 2007 madelin/index.html
b10b7c0c272f222899505a0f5e064c91 madelin/index.html
A illustration of how H.A.A.R.P works in practice,
based on a U.S. Patent document.
-rw-r--r-- 3 crashrec klant 15486 Nov 1 2007 haarp/index.html
8d96e3c949e966024b7819fa4b3bfdd3 haarp/index.html
A lot of content concerning the NWO is somehow
related to the Bible. As a convenience i present a restaurated
copy of http://www.htmlbible.com/ which recently somehow disappeared
from the internet.
-rw-r--r-- 4 htbible klant 348 Mar 8 2007 htbible/index.html
36050cb040cc8bb8212411aefe640e11 htbible/index.html
To verify the md5sum checksum and file sizes, load
the same url, with https.
So when you have http://crashrecovery.org/moneymasters/ inside your
browser, reload the same url with
https://crashrecovery.org/moneymasters/ in a new window or tab and
save the new loaded page as a file, i.e. internet.html. The md5
checksum and file size of internet.html should be the same as
internet/index.html as listed above.
Note that the "Save Page As..."
option in many modern browserslike e.g. Mozilla Firefox produces bad
md5 checksums. Somehow some extra garbage html is added. In such cases
one should use wget and md5sum.