Contents:

"Dark Matter, a result of the heliocentric doctrine"
Art Bell - The Philidelphia Experiment - Al Bielek
The Temple of Man
Stellar Death Shrouds : The all-seeing evil eye?
Downloads

The Earth is not Moving The Earth is not Moving










Dark Matter, a result of the heliocentric doctrine


Cloak and Dagger ran the following banner:

....   Marshall McLuhan suspected that "secret societies" and "secret doctrines" associated with gnosticism, Rosicrucianism, and Masonry persisted among the highest elites in the twentieth century. REFERENCE: "Last year has been spent in going through rituals of secret societies with fine comb. As I said before I'm in a bloody rage at the discovery that the arts and sciences are in the pockets of these societies."  wrote Marshall McLuhan in The Letters Of Marshall McLuhan.....///

"The Earth is not moving" is a astounding scholarly work debunking the BIGGEST DECEPTION laid upon the grand public by the Science Establishment ever. What Deception? The Heliocentric system turns out to be a fabricated model of our planetary system, which started around the year 1600, whilest the King James Bible was getting translated. Marshall Hall starts of by mentioning that all NASA calculations which should deliver the highest accuracy are based on a non-moving earth. Interesting enough while the King James Bible 1611 was written in English all the key works of Astronomy were published in ... Latin.

Nicolaus Copernicus a Polish astronomer born in 1473 and dies in 1543 on the same day when his newly published book "De revolutionibus orbium coelestium" (On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres) was finished and put in his hands.
Johannes Kepler Assistant of Tycho Brahe, the Danisch Astronomer who archived the most accurate astronomical observational data at the time. Brahe the Dean Astronomer dies of food poisoning in 1601... Kepler inherits all of Brahe's data and subsequently publishes Kepler's Laws in "Astronomia nova" (1609) and "Harmonices Mundi" (1619).
Sir Isaac Newton published his three laws of motion inside "Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica" (July 5, 1687), resulting in classical mechanics and was both a Illuminist and Alchemist.
Albert Einstein Highly interested in the Theosophical aspects of physics. Advises fellow physicists to get a copy of H. P. Blavatsky's "Secret Doctrine" and keep it on their desks.
Paul Warburg, founder of the 1913 Federal Reserve Bank, presents Albert Einstein (see e.g. The Money Masters (c)1997 Documentary by Patrick S.J. Carmack, B.B.A., J.D. William S. Still & Robert Krueger, Rick James) The back of the current ONE Dollar bill featuring the New World Order pyramid as introduced by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1935


What could have triggered these men to publish their books in Latin and at the same time support and promote the same Heliocentric doctrine? Why would all of a sudden have the old Ptolemaic system become outdated, after prevailing for nearly 18 centuries, from 300 BC until the 1500's? At the most prominent Universities, Ptolemy's "Almagest" [6] is still a requirement on the Astronomy Curriculum. "Almagest", originally written in Greek, even today supplies the most accurate mathematical model and predictions of solar and lunar orbital tracks around our planet. Ptolemy's work however does not explain the mechanics behind the mathematical model, and is still a mystery today.

Inside his book "The Earth is not Moving" [1], Marshall Hall claims proof that it was the upcoming publication of the King James Bible in 1611, written in the English language, which triggered a secret movement of Alchemists, Hermeticists, Astronomers and Sorcerers to discredit the Bible. As the word of God is in full agreement with the Ptolemaic system, their tactics was to start promoting a new doctrine of our solar system, the Heliocentric system, and as such would discredit the Bible in one move as bunk material.

For a discussion of "The Earth is not Moving" visit the thread :

"Dark Matter, a result of the heliocentric doctrine"
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4916

or read a local (read-only) copy of the above thread here :
"Dark Matter, a result of the heliocentric doctrine"
http://crashrecovery.org/fixedearth/davidicke/showthread1.php
http://crashrecovery.org/fixedearth/davidicke/showthread2.php
http://crashrecovery.org/fixedearth/davidicke/showthread3.php

for a discussion on USENET visit the following thread :

"Dark Matter, a result of the heliocentric doctrine"
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_umsgid=pan.2008.02.23.19.48.50.213021@stokkie.net
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/688324f5cc27f351/ccf47502b6bc382b



[1] The Earth is not Moving
by Marshall Hal

Paperback: 329 pages
Publisher: Fair Education Foundation Inc. Third Printing, (April 2005)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0-932766-20-X
http://www.fixedearth.com/old_format.html

[2] Dark Matter, Missing Planets and New Comets (Paradoxes Resolved, Origins Illuminated)
by Tom Van Flandern

Paperback: 428 pages
Publisher: North Atlantic Books; Rev. ed edition (February 1993)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1556431554
ISBN-13: 978-1556431555
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1556431554/103-4342669-4911013

[3] Dark Matter, Missing Planets and New Comets: Paradoxes Resolved, Origins Illuminated Second Edition
by Van Flandern

Paperback: 515 pages
Publisher: North Atlantic Books; Rev Sub edition (January 8, 1999)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1556432682
ISBN-13: 978-1556432682
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1556432682/105-7815899-7734809
http://metaresearch.org/publications/books/books.asp

From "Morry on the Market",
50 Broadway, Suite 3700, New York, NY 10004,
Market Letter #59, Nov. 30, 1994,
by Morris J. Markovitz, quoted in its entirety:

"Recommended reading: If you have any interest in pondering matters scientific, I can't recommend too highly Dark Matter, Missing Planets and New Comets, by Tom Van Flandern ($18.95 from North Atlantic Books, PO Box 12327, Berkeley, CA 94701).

This is the most interesting new book on any subject that I've read in years, and the most interesting of its type -- exciting, even -- I've ever read. Yet it's a quite easy read, containing hardly any explicit mathematics. Van Flandern is an astronomer with such impeccably well established credentials that his peers can't completely dismiss his maverick theories. From a simple, sensible starting point he carries the reader, by purely deductive reasoning, to a new view of the basic nature of things: from electrons to galaxies, from the nature of a photon to the cause of gravity to the origin of the solar system.

Along the way, several paradoxes of existing, theories (relativity, quantum mechanics, etc.) are explained and then resolved (or their resolutions indicated) in the most simple and easily understandable expositions I've ever seen. Those acquainted in some detail with existing theories will appreciate the creative brilliance of Van Flandern's insights, the kind that seem to turn on a mental switch that blasts away every shadow in your field of vision at once, and the kind with which his book literally teems (the unpretentious simplicity of the author's conversational style may disguise its radical significance from the casual reader).

Challenging much of existing scientific orthodoxy, Van Flandern's new theory is able to cover the ground of several current theories at once, but more simply and directly than any, with fewer inconsistencies, and without requiring the abandonment of a common sense view of the world. (Coincidentally, only within the past few days it has been reported that the newly operational Hubble telescope's inability to find so-called dark matter has thrown scientists into turmoil because currently accepted cosmological theory requires that the universe be about 90% filled with it. This is precisely one of Van Flandern's predictions (amongst many more): that no dark matter would be found by the Hubble scope, because there is no dark matter; that there was no need for scientists to infer its existence in the first place; that the phenomena which led them to infer it were already predicted and fully explained by Van Flandern's own simple view of gravitation [and by the way, there are no black holes either, according to Van Flandern]). My guess is that many more of Van Flandern's predictions are destined to be verified, and I believe this book may eventually find a place at the base of future scientific inquiry in many fields, not the least of which may be the philosophy of science (specifically its epistemology).

If you are curious about such things as the nature of matter and the origin of the solar system, but feel inadequately equipped to grasp what modern science has to say about such things, read this book. You will not get the all-too-common condescending attempt to water-down the mysteries of modern science into a form intelligible to little-non-scientist you, but rather a straightforward new theory, logically derived in front of your eyes, which challenges the roots of many of today's complex accepted paradigms, yet whose essence is simple enough to be thoroughly communicated to the intelligent layman without losing in the translation ."

The Trouble With Physics: The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next, Lee Smolin (c)2006 [4] The Trouble With Physics: The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next
by Lee Smolin

Paperback: 392 pages
Publisher: Mariner Books; 1 edition (September 4, 2007)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 061891868X
ISBN-13: 978-0618918683
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/061891868X/103-6148325-1179808

Not Even Wrong, The Failure of String Theory and the Continuing Challenge to Unify the Laws of Physics, Peter Woit (c)2006 [5] Not Even Wrong, The Failure of String Theory and the Continuing Challenge to Unify the Laws of Physics
by Peter Woit

Paperback: 304 pages
Publisher: Vintage Books; New Ed edition (June 26, 2007)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0099488647
ISBN-13: 978-0099488644
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0099488647
http://www.rbooks.co.uk/product.aspx?id=0099488647
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/

Ptolemy's Almagest, G.J. Toomer (c)1998 [6] Ptolemy's "Almagest"
by Ptolemy (Author), Owen Gingerich (Foreword), G. J. Toomer
(Translator)
Paperback: 693 pages
Publisher: Princeton University Press; New Ed edition (October 19, 1998)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0691002606
ISBN-13: 978-0691002606
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0691002606







Tachyon Field visualization



Art Bell - The Philidelphia Experiment - Al Bielek


Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 00:00:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Robert M. Stockmann" 
To: lennybloom@gmail.com, stewwebb@sierranv.net, 
     stefangrossmann@t-online.de>, too@slingshot.co.nz, 
     wmreditor@waynemadsenreport.com, palast@gregpalast.com, 
     tom@tomflocco.com, skolnick@ameritech.net, henry@savethemales.ca, 
     prophecy@texemarrs.com, smith@iamthewitness.com, 
     eric@iamthewitness.com, captainmay@prodigy.net, 
     tarpley@tarpley.net, takingaim@pacbell.net, webmaster@rense.com, 
     articles@davidicke.com, chamish@netvision.net.il, 
     crescentandcross@gmail.com, tips@infowars.com, 
     cloak.dagger@gmail.com, eric@vaticanassassins.org
Subject: Re: Art Bell - The Philidelphia Experiment - Al Bielek
In-Reply-To: 
Message-ID: 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Hi,

I think the physics establishment elites have messed things up pretty 
bad in the so-called authorative places for Education. We know from
Norman Dodd that the Cargenie Endowment has seriously tampered
with the education of American history in US Universties and Colleges.

I listened again to the Art Bell - The Philadelphia Experiment - Al 
Bielek interview and added a transcript of some parts, see below. It's 
clear something is definitely not right with so-called authorative 
physics textbooks and its education.

Going through the works and findings of fact by retired Lt. Col Thomas 
E. Bearden should reveal some major coverups in physics. An interview 
with Bearden [1] appeared in a magazine called "Megabrain Report" from 
4-Feb-1991, which sure is worth going through.

Regards,

Robert

On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Robert M. Stockmann wrote:

Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 02:24:49 +0200 (CEST)
From: Robert M. Stockmann 
To: Lenny Bloom 
Subject: Re: Art Bell - The Philidelphia Experiment - Al Bielek

On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Lenny Bloom wrote:

> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 15:10:48 -0400
> From: Lenny Bloom 
> To: Robert M. Stockmann 
> Subject: Re: Art Bell - The Philidelphia Experiment - Al Bielek
> 
> I interviewed Al and I have spent time with his brother who I know
> personally namely Duncan Cameron.
> What do you think of that?

Oh thats just great! What do you know about the Cameron family?
AFAIK they were the operators of The Philidelphia Experiment
and project Montauk, in cooperation with Tesla and Neumann...

The way Al starts of during Arts Bell's show gave me a impression
that he was messing up his own identity, in effect blowing up his
entire story and credibility..

But, during the show some interesting things were revealed, namely the 
claim by Bielek that todays Maxwell Equations, as lectured in college, 
are severely tampered with. In effect Bielek claims that Einstein's 
hypothesis that the speed of light is a constant, independent of 
surrounding physics characteristics, is a false one.

The original Maxwell Equations as written down by Maxwell himself are 
today concealed from public knowledge, where one component of the 
Fields, E, the electric field, is in fact emanating with infinite 
speed throughout the universe. Thomas H. Bearden has touched upon that 
also.

The Michaelson Morley experiments which failed to find the speed of the 
aether at planet Earth, became a very nasty problems for the 
establishment physics elites. In 1905 a Bern Patent office clerk by the 
name of Albert Einstein came up with a very elegant way out of their 
problem. His mathematical solution to this physics problem is still in 
place today. I dare to claim that his contribution to solve _their_ 
nasty physics cover-up problem is why the nation of Israel is today 
allowed to make an attempt for world government.

I wrote a couple of remarks about this story :

"Dark Matter, a result of the heliocentric doctrine"
 http://crashrecovery.org/fixedearth/
 http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4916

which basicly is a commentary on the book 

"The Earth is not Moving"
 be Marshall Hall,
 Fair Education Foundation Inc. Third Printing, (April 2005)
 http://www.fixedearth.com/order.htm
 (If that URL doesn't work directly look it up on
     http://web.archive.org/ )

So how is Al Bielek doing today? I read from his website
http://www.bielek.com/ that his health is under severe attack.

So how real is this all?

I think if proof is available that 'they' already manipulated
the original Maxwell Equations as written down by Maxwell himself,
a lot of presented material by Montauk and Philadelphia Experiment
survivors should be allowed to regain new credit.

Thanks,
Best Regards,

Robert
PS. I made a transcript of parts of the Art Bell/Al Bielek interview
    from Jun 19, 1993 

Alfred Bielek on the Maxwell Equations
======================================

01:26:50
========

  "Very quickly then, Line two your on the air, with Al Bielek in Las 
   Vegas, Where are you calling from please?

   Line two? No your not there, Out of state, good morning your on the 
   air.

   Ay ay,

   Hello? Where are you calling us from sir?

   Boogie Boogie land

   Oh I don't think we'll do with that. Line three, your on the air 
   with Al Bielek.

   Well Dr. Bielek I have a question. What is the name of these 
   fundamental set equations that gover classical electromagnetism?

   I'm sorry, could you repeat the question?

   What is the name of the set of equations that govern classical 
   electromagnetism?

   Well if you go into classical electromagnetism, your are going to 
   find that there are discrepancies there, and that it does not agree 
   with some of the work..

   I just want to know the name of the set of these equations.

   I couldn't give you all of that information.

   Ok that's fine. The name is Maxwell's equations, which probably any 
   software and physics man understands. I know a ex <inaudible> who
   was John von Neumann's graduate student. I was first living with him
   on University Campus, and he talked about being at the John von 
   Neumann funeral in 1957 ... Sir.

   There was a funeral ..

   Eh yeah, and eh I have heard of Dr. Friedman who was up at the 
   Linear Collider out of Stanford, I've heard him speak. And he seems 
   like a very credible person. I have spoken with him, just very 
   briefly, but I've been to a couple of his lectures, he seems very 
   credible.

   And eh thirdly i like to point out something, and that it is 
   possible to distort space-time. But you need something that has a 
   very very large mass, such as a black hole. So I have to say this 
   Sir, that i don't ..

   All right oh hold on. Let him respond, You just said the only way 
   to distort it was a black hole in a event horizon ..

   Basicly a large mass.

   Yeah i understand, Al go answer that.

   Well that's in terms of current thinking in where they admitting 
   maybe time travel is possible in terms of classical physics as its 
   used today, ehh does not require a large mass. It requires 
   manipulation of the three basic elements of our field theory. If 
   you manipulate three, namely Electric field, Gravitic field and 
   Tachyon field, you then can manipulate the fourth which is the Time 
   field. It does take power but it does not take mass. The mass has 
   nothing todo with it. And mass is a misnomer in terms of the real 
   physics if you ever went through it. Because what they teach today 
   in the universities, in terms of electromagnetic theory and physics 
   is largely garbage.

   All right.

01:40:40
========

  "Line two are you there?

   Yes

   Where are you calling from sir?

   Eh Las Vegas :

   Ok go ahead

   I don't buy it! When i was in college i minored in physics, I 
   majored in electrical engineering, and uhm everything that you have 
   said is bunk!

   Well your entitled to your opinions

   No its not an opinion, I eh, it em you know

   What specificly eh, if you gonna say this sort of thing Sir, is 
   bunk? What can you prove to be bunk..

   Ok your statement that Maxwell's equations are not complete,

   Oh were you on the air here earlier?

   Yeah, well i was not on the air here earlier.

   Oh ok go on sir, your statement that Maxwell's equations were not 
   complete.

   You said they were not complete. Well i have a book here its 
   called Engineering Electromagnetics that derives Maxwell's 
   equations step by step going back to Coulomb's law. There is 
   nothing missing there. And secondly your contention that you would 
   need ..

   Well lets take em one at the time. Do you wanna answer that Al?

   Ok, are you familiar with Tom Bearden? Thomas E. Bearden.

   Are you familiar with Mr. Bearden caller? 

   Eh no, but i can't really hear what the other fellah is saying...

   Oh all right you will have to listen on air then. Thank you, all 
   right then go right ahead then Al, what does Mr. Bearden had to do 
   with this.

   Thomas Bearden has gone through this also, and derived the fact 
   that the original Maxwell equations as written by Maxwell in the 
   hand written versions, which are well over a hundred years old, are 
   _not_ what is currently taught in the universities, because Dr. 
   Heaviside in 1875, because they were hard to understand, and they 
   could not accept the idea that in the denominator E, as the 
   electrostatic field, was in Maxwell's original equations stated 
   that it propagates instantaneously throughout the universe, which 
   would immediate violate all of the ideas of relativity and c being 
   the limiting speed of everything in the universe.

   So that part has been eliminated basicly from most of the college 
   texts. You may have some texts that show the original but I'm not 
   familiar with every book that is around. But nonetheless they 
   normally teach the truncated version developed by Heaviside in 1875 
   which was an attempt to simplify those equations and make them more 
   understandable.

   All Right, All right. Well, your over my head."

-- 
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org  stock@stokkie.net


[1] "Interview with Lt. Col. Thomas E. Bearden"
by Terry Patten and Michael Hutchison

"Megabrain Report", 4-Feb-1991
http://twm.co.nz/beard_interview.htm
http://www.cheniere.org/misc/interview1991.htm



Scheme of Giza Power Plant The Giza Power Plant : Technologies of Ancient Egypt, by Christopher P. Dunn













The Temple of Man



Joseph P. Farrell interview by Frank Walen, Mar 09, 2007
========================================================

Joseph P. Farrell, a University of Oxford PhD in Patristics from 1987,
has studied ancient texts since the 1980's. He has elaborated on the
works, the Sumerian texts, by Zecharia Sitchin, http://www.sitchin.com/. 
Since March 9, 2000 he has, together with a number of colleague expert
scientists in their field, put-up a website called

http://www.gizapyramid.com/

which links to another website 

"Great Pyramid photo courtesy of Jon Bodsworth"
http://www.egyptarchive.co.uk/

containing a remarkable archive of high quality pictures of numerous
archaeological artifacts from Egypt.

Joseph P. Farrell was interviewed by Frank Whalen of the RBN 
Radio Broadcast on March 9, 2007. Download the 4 hour interview at :

 http://crashrecovery.org/farrell/03-09-2007_Hr1.mp3
 http://crashrecovery.org/farrell/03-09-2007_Hr2.mp3
 http://crashrecovery.org/farrell/03-09-2007_Hr3.mp3
 http://crashrecovery.org/farrell/03-09-2007_Hr4.mp3

Since 911, Farrell has connected some dots which lead to a incredible 
view of what actually is going on. Farrell concludes that Nazi SS 
secret research groups were looking for lost technologies from 10.000 
years ago, like we remember from movies like "Raiders of the Lost Ark", 
"The Last Crusade". What were they looking for? A lot of evidence 
points to the pyramid structures at Giza.

Farrell got interested into the work of Christopher Dunn who wrote the 
book "The Giza Power Plant - Technologies of Ancient Egypt" [1] where
Dunn presents the case that Giza was NOT some tomb mausoleum for past 
pharaoh's, which clearly is a smokescreen frequently displayed on 
National Geographic and History Channel. Instead Dunn presents the 
case that the Giza Pyramid was actually a highly sophisticated 
powerplant.

After some pondering, knowing the work of Richard Hoagland and Tom Van 
Flandern, Farrell however concludes that the true purpose of the Giza 
Pyramids was not some Giza Power Plant, but were actually a shell 
structure for a incredible Weapon of Mass Destruction of ancient times. 
All what is needed were some missing components, still to be recovered, 
which could bring this Egypt WMD back "online"....

Farrell wrote a series of books on this to be found at
http://www.adventuresunlimitedpress.com/  :

- "The Giza Death Star, The Paleophysics of the Great Pyramid
       & the Military Complex at Giza"
   by Joseph P. Farrell. 290 pages,
   ISBN: 0-932813-38-0
   http://www.adventuresunlimitedpress.com/proddetail.php?prod=GDS

- "Giza Death Star Deployed, The Physics
       & Engineering of the Great Pyramid"
   by Joseph P. Farrell. 248 pages,
   ISBN: 1-931882-19-3
   http://www.adventuresunlimitedpress.com/proddetail.php?prod=GDSD

- "Giza Death Star Destroyed, The Ancient War For Future Science"
   by Joseph P. Farrell. 292 pages,
   ISBN: 1-931882-47-9
   http://www.adventuresunlimitedpress.com/proddetail.php?prod=GDES

- "Reich Of The Black Sun, Nazi Secret Weapons
   and the Cold War Allied Legend"
   by Joseph P. Farrell. 352 pages,
   ISBN: 1-931882-39-8
   http://www.adventuresunlimitedpress.com/proddetail.php?prod=ROBS

- "Reich of the Black Sun (DVD)"
   with Joseph P. Farrell. Boxed DVD, 76 minutes.
   http://www.adventuresunlimitedpress.com/proddetail.php?prod=RBSD

- "SS BROTHERHOOD OF THE BELL, The Nazis' Incredible Secret Technology"
   by Joseph P. Farrell. 456 pages,
   ISBN: 1-931882-61-4
   http://www.adventuresunlimitedpress.com/proddetail.php?prod=SSBB

- "THE COSMIC WAR, Interplanetary Warfare, Modern Physics and
   Ancient Texts"
   by Joseph P. Farrell. 436 pages,
   ISBN: 978-1-931882-75-0
   http://www.adventuresunlimitedpress.com/proddetail.php?prod=COSW

One of the key stone bookworks refered to by Farrell, beside the books 
of Sitchin, is a book [2] by a French writer called Rene Schwaller de 
Lubicz, which is a master piece in itself  :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._A._Schwaller_de_Lubicz

  "René A. Schwaller de Lubicz (1887-1961), born in Alsace-Lorraine, 
   was best known for his 15-year study of the art and architecture of 
   Temple of Luxor in Egypt and his subsequent book The Temple of Man 
   (ISBN 0-89281-021-1). In the book, he explored the connectedness of 
   ancient Egyptian philosophy, spirituality, mathematics, and science.

   He was given the title "de Lubicz" by the Lithuanian writer and 
   diplomat Oscar Vladislas de Lubicz Milosz.[citation needed]

   His background is that of an alchemist, inspired by Paracelsus and 
   other such "masters of the craft" (as it is declared in the 
   foreword of The Temple of Man) and, as such, he taught groups of 
   people inclined to accept that approach to the study of nature.

   He is known for his role in outlining what is known as sacred 
   Egyptian architecture. His elucidation of the temple at Luxor and 
   his presentation of the Egyptian understanding of a special quality 
   of innate consciousness form a bridge that attempts to link the 
   sacred science of the Ancients to its what some people consider its 
   rediscovery in our own time. In his chief work, The Temple of Man, 
   he proposes, and argues in great detail, for an interpretation of 
   the Egyptian outlook rooted in numerological and geometrical 
   mysticism; in several of his other works, he makes a corresponding 
   case for the metaphysical richness of various mathematical 
   concepts. As with much ancient mathematics, Egyptian research 
   became quite complex; what can be drawn from that complexity 
   remains subject to debate.

   His arguments are controversial today among modern Egyptologists. 
   He is considered by some contemporary mystics to be one of the more 
   important philosophers, mathematicians, and Egyptologists of the 
   twentieth century.[citation needed] His work is not accepted at all 
   by the scientific community, where it is hardly, if ever, mentioned."

[1] "The Giza Power Plant : Technologies of Ancient Egypt"
by Christopher Dunn

Paperback: 288 pages
Publisher: Bear & Company (August 1, 1998)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 1879181509
ISBN-13: 978-1879181502
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1879181509/103-3134602-6712605
http://www.gizapower.com/

The Temple of Man, by R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz [2] "The Temple of Man"
by R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz

Product Details
Hardcover: 1088 pages
Publisher: Inner Traditions; 2-Volume Set edition (November 1, 1998)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0892815701
ISBN-13: 978-0892815708
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0892815701/102-8200219-6028118
A review of this book can be found here [3] :

[3] "The Temple of Man"
by R. A. Schwaller de Lubicz

Original French text translated to English by Debra and Robert Lawlor
Published by Inner Traditions International, 1998
Review by Dr. Colette M. Dowell © 1998 "
http://www.robertschoch.net/The Temple of Man.htm



Cat's Eye Nebula * NGC 6543 The evil Eye of Sauron













Stellar Death Shrouds : The all-seeing evil eye?


Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:15:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Robert M. Stockmann" 
To: stewwebb@sierranv.net, stefangrossmann@t-online.de, 
     too@slingshot.co.nz, timrifat@rvscience.com,
     wmreditor@waynemadsenreport.com, palast@gregpalast.com,
     tom@tomflocco.com, skolnick@ameritech.net, 
     henry@savethemales.ca, leurenmoret@yahoo.com, 
     prophecy@texemarrs.com, smith@iamthewitness.com, 
     eric@iamthewitness.com, captainmay@prodigy.net, 
     tarpley@tarpley.net, takingaim@pacbell.net, webmaster@rense.com, 
     articles@davidicke.com, chamish@netvision.net.il, 
     michaelcollinspiper1960@yahoo.com, crescentandcross@gmail.com, 
     tips@infowars.com, cloak.dagger@gmail.com, lennybloom@gmail.com, 
     eric@vaticanassassins.org, email@spirituallysmart.com, 
     deadlinelive@yahoo.com, vyzygoth@hotmail.com, 
     alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com, Tillawi@currentissues.tv, 
     prothink@yahoo.com
Subject: Stellar Death Shrouds : The all-seeing evil eye?
Message-ID: 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Status: RO
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                 

Hi,

As many have noticed how the powers of evil have become more and more 
imminent inside our society, the proposition that such an amount of 
evil has always been lingering inside caves or underneath some heavy 
rocks should be ruled out.

Michael Tsarion, who has studied the origins of evil, presented some 
possible causes for the present outbursts of evil [1]. Tsarion presents 
the case that due to an alien visitation, mankind has been geneticly 
altered, whereby its capabilities were lowered and made susceptible to 
evil rulership.

Today while reading some IT gossip news, I stumbled across a webpage 
where a rant is presented about the very poor service warranty by 
Microsoft on its latest xbox product the Xbox 360 [2]:

"Xbox 360s Still Dying, Customer Service Still Crap"

Stellar Death Shroud: The Helix Nebula in Aquarius, the Red Eye? "I convinced my dad to buy my older brother an Xbox 360 earlier this year for his birthday.
Drew loves gaming, but wasn't decided on whether he wanted the Playstation 3, Wii or 360, so I decided for him. I was pretty sure I had made the right call after he received it and started playing the games. He had an Xbox and loved a lot of the titles on that system, so it seemed like a natural fit.
Then he called me last night to tell my his system, his three week old system that he had played exactly one game on had crapped out on him. He was getting the red ring of death. So I told him to call customer service.
"They'll handle everything, they're great. They'll even pay for shipping and Fed-Ex it for you. That's what they did for my systems (yes, plural) when they died." ..."

On the same webpage a picture of a stellar nebula is shown titled 
"Stellar Death Shroud: The Helix Nebula in Aquarius" where apparently 
the poor kids Xbox 360 had died displaying the so called "red ring of 
death". I first thought yeah right, but then, when searching for 
"Stellar Death Shroud", it turns out to be a real naming as used by 
professional astronomers themselves : "Physics 3250: An Introduction to 
Astrophysics .... Spring 2008" [3]. Amazingly the page starts with the 
display of two stellar nebula with the caption :

   "....expanding death shrouds of dead stars (white dwarfs at center), 
    or have astronomers stumbled upon the Eye of Sauron?"

And indeed the second picture titled : "Cat's Eye Nebula * NGC 6543"
shows a remarkable resemblance to Tolkien's Eye of Sauron. It looks 
like a light-bulb where from both sides gas is blown into the center of 
a discharge, where most probable a huge magnetic and/or electric field 
is resident.

Could it be the case that evil forces are emitted from outer space to 
planet Earth using "Stellar Death shrouds" like :

- Planetary Nebula NGC 6369 * "The Little Ghost"
  Nasa and The Hubble Heritage Team (STScl/AURA)
  Hubble Space Telescope WFPC2 * STSci-PRC02-25

- Cat's Eye Nebula * NGC 6543
  Nasa, ESA, HEIC and The Hubble Heritage Team (STScl/AURA)
  Hubble Space Telescope ACS * STSci-PRC04-27

- The Helix Nebula * NGC 7293 [4]
  NASA, WIYN, NOAO, ESA and Hubble Helix Nebula Team (STSci/NRAO)
  Hubble Space Telescope ACS * STSci
  
It turns out that this Helix thing has a firm impact on our planet.
 From [5] we read :

   "Because the nebula is nearby, it appears as nearly one-half the 
    diameter of the full Moon. This required HST astronomers to take 
    several exposures with the Advanced Camera for Surveys to capture 
    most of the Helix. HST views were then blended with a wider photo 
    taken by the Mosaic Camera. The portrait offers a dizzying look 
    down what is actually a trillion-mile-long tunnel of glowing gases. 
    The fluorescing tube is pointed nearly directly at Earth, so it 
    looks more like a bubble than a cylinder. A forest of thousands of 
    comet-like filaments, embedded along the inner rim of the nebula, 
    points back toward the central star, which is a small, super-hot 
    white dwarf."

Then it dawned on me that not long ago NASA had decided to allow the 
entire Hubble Telescope to expire into orbital dust [6]:

  "Debate over final servicing mission

   Columbia was originally scheduled to visit Hubble again in February 
   2005. The tasks of this servicing mission would have included 
   replacing a fine guidance sensor and two broken gyroscopes, placing 
   protective "blankets" on top of torn insulation, replacing the Wide 
   Field and Planetary Camera 2 with a new Wide Field Camera 3 and 
   installing the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS). However, 
   then-NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe decided that, in order to 
   prevent a repeat of the Columbia disaster, all future shuttles must 
   be able to reach the 'safe-haven' of the International Space 
   Station (ISS) should an in-flight problem develop which would 
   preclude the shuttle from landing safely. The shuttle is incapable 
   of reaching both the Hubble Space Telescope and the International 
   Space Station during the same mission, and so future manned service 
   missions were canceled.[103]

   This decision was assailed by numerous astronomers, who felt that 
   the Hubble telescope was valuable enough to merit the human risk. 
   HST's successor, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), will not be 
   ready until well after the 2010 scheduled retirement of the Space 
   Shuttle. While Hubble can image in the ultraviolet and visible 
   wavelengths, JWST is limited to the infrared. The break in 
   space-observing capabilities between the decommissioning of Hubble 
   and the commissioning of a successor is of major concern to many 
   astronomers, given the great scientific impact of HST taken as a 
   whole.[104] The consideration that the JWST will not be located in 
   low Earth orbit, and therefore cannot be easily repaired in the 
   event of an early failure, only makes these concerns more acute. 
   Nor can JWST's instruments be easily upgraded. On the other hand, 
   many astronomers feel strongly that the servicing of Hubble should 
   not  take place if the costs of the servicing come from the JWST 
   budget.

   In January 2004, O'Keefe said that he would review his decision to 
   cancel the final shuttle servicing mission to HST due to public 
   outcry and requests from Congress for NASA to look for a way to 
   save it. On 13 July 2004 an official panel from the National 
   Academy of Sciences made the recommendation that the Hubble be 
   preserved despite the apparent risks. Their report urged "NASA 
   should take no actions that would preclude a space shuttle 
   servicing mission to the Hubble Space Telescope". In August 2004, 
   O'Keefe requested the Goddard Space Flight Center to prepare a 
   detailed proposal for a robotic service mission. These plans were 
   later canceled, the robotic mission being described as "not 
   feasible."[105] In late 2004, several Congressional members, led by 
   Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), held public hearings and carried on a 
   fight with much public support (including thousands of letters from 
   school children across the country) to get the Bush Administration 
   and NASA to reconsider the decision to drop plans for a Hubble 
   rescue mission. [106]
   
   The arrival in April 2005 of the new NASA Administrator, Mike 
   Griffin, changed the status of the proposed shuttle rescue mission. 
   At the time, Griffin stated he would reconsider the possibility of 
   a manned servicing mission. Soon after his appointment, he 
   authorized Goddard Space Flight Center to proceed with preparing 
   for a manned Hubble maintenance flight, saying he would make the 
   final decision on this flight after the next two shuttle missions. 
   In October 2006 Griffin gave the final go-ahead for the mission. 
   The 11-day STS-125 mission by Atlantis, scheduled for launch on 10 
   October 2008,[107] will install fresh batteries, replace all 
   gyroscopes, and install Wide Field Camera 3 and the Cosmic Origins 
   Spectrograph.[108]"

Now why would there be such a controversy about maintaining a highly 
valuable NASA project like Hubble? Could it be that evil forces have 
closed in from outer space and are using radiation from these Stellar 
Death Shrouds to keep people down and locked into evil? Especially key 
people within NASA? Think about it. Scalar HAARP and Hurricane Katrina
could be explained by this. Also remember that the visual diameter of 
"The Red Ring of Death" is half the size of a full moon.

Best Regards,

Robert
-- 
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org  stock@stokkie.net

[1] The Origins of Evil [Michael Tsarion]
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8360601521310929801

[2] "Xbox 360s Still Dying, Customer Service Still Crap"
by Brian Crecente
, Managing editor,
8:00 AM on Tue Dec 19 2006 Kotaku Team Website
http://kotaku.com/gaming/xbox-360/xbox-360s-still-dying-customer-service-still-crap-222843.php

[3] "Physics 3250: An Introduction to Astrophysics....Spring 2008"
by Kirk Korista
, Astronomics Instructor
Physics Department Office: 1120 Everett Tower
Physics Department phone: (269) 387-4940
http://homepages.wmich.edu/~korista/phys325.html

[4] "APOD: 2003 May 10 - NGC 7293: The Helix Nebula"
http://www.sai.msu.su/apod/ap030510.html
http://archive.stsci.edu/hst/helix/

[5] "Image:Iridescent Glory of Nearby Helix Nebula.jpg"
From Wikimedia Commons
, the free media repository
http://www.wiks.sccdcwy.org/link-Category:Hubble_images
http://www.wiks.sccdcwy.org/link-Image:Iridescent_Glory_of_Nearby_Helix_Nebula.jpg

[6] Hubble Space Telescope
From Wikipedia
, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Space_Telescope


total 31544
-rw-r--r--    1 crashrec klant    22212049 Aug  8 00:56 Art Bell - Al Bielek.mp3

First published on Wed, 13 Jun 2006